Investopedia vs Stockopedia comparison

Investopedia focuses on Education, Blogs, and News while Stockopedia specializes in Screeners, Stock Ideas, and Financials. They overlap in 6 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Investopedia offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while Stockopedia requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with Investopedia and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

Stockopedia has a mobile app so you can check your research on the go. Investopedia is web-only, so you'll need a browser to access it from mobile devices.

Choose Investopedia if you need Large education library: 36,000+ articles including 14,000+ definitions of financial terms; editorial standards emphasize education (no buy/sell/hold recommendations)., and Dedicated market news coverage (e.g., markets, companies, earnings, crypto, personal finance).. Go with Stockopedia if Equity screener with more than 350 ratios and over 65 prebuilt “GuruScreens.”, and StockRanks™ system rates every stock on Quality, Value, and Momentum, with additional risk ratings and style classifications. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, and ETFs. Investopedia also includes Bonds, Options, Commodities, and Cryptos. Stockopedia adds coverage for Closed-End Funds.

Stockopedia supports data exports to CSV, and Excel. Investopedia has more limited export options.

Both Investopedia and Stockopedia include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Both platforms include portfolio tracking, so you can monitor your holdings, performance, and allocation in one place.