StockFetcher vs Stockopedia comparison

StockFetcher focuses on Screeners, Watchlist, and Data Visualizations while Stockopedia specializes in Screeners, Stock Ideas, and Financials. They overlap in 4 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Both platforms require a paid subscription to access their full feature set. Compare the pricing details above to find the best value for your needs.

Stockopedia has a mobile app so you can check your research on the go. StockFetcher is web-only, so you'll need a browser to access it from mobile devices.

Choose StockFetcher if you need Filter stocks using a plain-English, text-based query language built on 125+ technical indicators., and Two plan levels: Standard and Advanced. Standard includes up to 100 saved filters and watchlists; Advanced expands to 250 each, larger symbol lists, bigger CSV exports, and advanced filter support.. Go with Stockopedia if Equity screener with more than 350 ratios and over 65 prebuilt “GuruScreens.”, and StockRanks™ system rates every stock on Quality, Value, and Momentum, with additional risk ratings and style classifications. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks. Stockopedia adds coverage for ETFs, and Closed-End Funds.

Both platforms let you export data to spreadsheets (CSV). This is useful for custom analysis or record-keeping.

Both StockFetcher and Stockopedia include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Stockopedia offers portfolio tracking features. StockFetcher is more focused on research and analysis.