ChartMill vs Stockopedia comparison

ChartMill focuses on Screeners, Stock Ideas, and Data Visualizations while Stockopedia specializes in Screeners, Stock Ideas, and Financials. They overlap in 11 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

ChartMill offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while Stockopedia requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with ChartMill and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

Stockopedia has a mobile app so you can check your research on the go. ChartMill is web-only, so you'll need a browser to access it from mobile devices.

Choose ChartMill if you need Free advanced stock screener with technical + fundamental filters (dividend, valuation, growth, profitability, health), custom expressions, saved screens, and customizable result views (tables/charts)., and Trading Ideas library of pre-configured screens/strategies that can be run and adapted.. Go with Stockopedia if Equity screener with more than 350 ratios and over 65 prebuilt “GuruScreens.”, and StockRanks™ system rates every stock on Quality, Value, and Momentum, with additional risk ratings and style classifications. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, and ETFs. Stockopedia adds coverage for Closed-End Funds.

Both platforms let you export data to spreadsheets (CSV). This is useful for custom analysis or record-keeping.

ChartMill is built with active traders in mind, offering features like real-time data and technical analysis. Stockopedia is better suited for buy-and-hold investors focused on fundamentals.

Both ChartMill and Stockopedia include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Stockopedia offers portfolio tracking features. ChartMill is more focused on research and analysis.