Frost & Sullivan vs MacroMicro comparison

Frost & Sullivan focuses on Scores, PMI / ISM, and Retail Sales while MacroMicro specializes in Data Visualizations, ETF Screeners, and ETF Comparison. They overlap in 4 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

MacroMicro offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while Frost & Sullivan requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with MacroMicro and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

MacroMicro provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. Frost & Sullivan doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose Frost & Sullivan if you need Frost Radar™: a signature benchmarking framework that scores companies on Growth and Innovation. Reports include the PDF download plus an analyst-led Growth Dialog™ session., and Online research store with single-purchase studies across industries and themes. Deliverables include Frost Radar reports, market and technology studies, and economic trackers, all offered as PDF downloads with list pricing.. Go with MacroMicro if Global macro and market database with more than 40 million data points across 100+ countries and coverage of 48+ asset fundamentals., and ETF toolkit includes a screener, comparator, and reverse lookup to see which ETFs include a given stock. better fits how you invest.

Both cover common asset types. Frost & Sullivan also includes Other. MacroMicro adds coverage for Stocks, ETFs, Bonds, Commodities, Currencies, and Cryptos.

MacroMicro supports data exports to CSV. Frost & Sullivan has more limited export options.

MacroMicro includes a stock screener for finding investment ideas. Frost & Sullivan focuses on other analytical tools.