Investopedia vs TradingView comparison

Investopedia focuses on Education, Blogs, and News while TradingView specializes in Data Visualizations, Quant, and Screeners. They overlap in 4 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both Investopedia and TradingView offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

TradingView has a mobile app so you can check your research on the go. Investopedia is web-only, so you'll need a browser to access it from mobile devices.

Choose Investopedia if you need Large education library: 36,000+ articles including 14,000+ definitions of financial terms; editorial standards emphasize education (no buy/sell/hold recommendations)., and Dedicated market news coverage (e.g., markets, companies, earnings, crypto, personal finance).. Go with TradingView if Markets covered include stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, bonds, FX, futures, and indices., and Supercharts with multi-chart layouts, custom intervals (incl. seconds and range bars), and more charts-per-tab on higher tiers (up to 16 on Ultimate). better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, ETFs, Bonds, and Cryptos. Investopedia also includes Options, and Commodities. TradingView adds coverage for Currencies, and Futures.

TradingView supports data exports to CSV, and Image. Investopedia has more limited export options.

TradingView connects with brokers for portfolio syncing. Investopedia requires manual portfolio entry or data import.

TradingView is built with active traders in mind, offering features like real-time data and technical analysis. Investopedia is better suited for buy-and-hold investors focused on fundamentals.

Both Investopedia and TradingView include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Both platforms include portfolio tracking, so you can monitor your holdings, performance, and allocation in one place.