ORTEX vs Stockopedia comparison

ORTEX focuses on Short Interest, Insider Data, and Quant while Stockopedia specializes in Screeners, Stock Ideas, and Financials. They overlap in 7 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

ORTEX offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while Stockopedia requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with ORTEX and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

ORTEX provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. Stockopedia doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose ORTEX if you need Short interest and lending analytics including utilization, cost to borrow, shares on loan, and percentage of free float on loan, with intraday and real-time estimates from a large pool of lenders and brokers., and Official U.S. exchange-reported short interest (bi-monthly) and European flagged shorts, alongside lending-based estimates.. Go with Stockopedia if Equity screener with more than 350 ratios and over 65 prebuilt “GuruScreens.”, and StockRanks™ system rates every stock on Quality, Value, and Momentum, with additional risk ratings and style classifications. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, and ETFs. ORTEX also includes Options. Stockopedia adds coverage for Closed-End Funds.

ORTEX offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. Stockopedia uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

Both platforms let you export data to spreadsheets (CSV). This is useful for custom analysis or record-keeping.

Both ORTEX and Stockopedia include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Stockopedia offers portfolio tracking features. ORTEX is more focused on research and analysis.