AlphaSense vs Reflexivity comparison

AlphaSense focuses on News, Alerts, and Screeners while Reflexivity specializes in Screeners, Quant, and Performance Attribution. They overlap in 8 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Both platforms require a paid subscription to access their full feature set. Compare the pricing details above to find the best value for your needs.

AlphaSense has a mobile app so you can check your research on the go. Reflexivity is web-only, so you'll need a browser to access it from mobile devices.

Yes, both platforms offer API access for developers and quants who want to build custom integrations or automate their workflows.

Choose AlphaSense if you need Generative Search: AI-assisted search that delivers fully cited insights (with source documents) ., and Deep Research: AI agent that autonomously generates research outputs / briefings by synthesizing content .. Go with Reflexivity if Institutional-grade AI research environment with verified data from S&P Global, Refinitiv Datastream, Nasdaq, and Cboe-all included without the need for separate data contracts., and Deep Research agent that can write and execute Python, run backtests, generate Excel models, export code and data, and produce publication-ready reports. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks. Reflexivity adds coverage for ETFs, Bonds, Commodities, and Currencies.

Reflexivity offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. AlphaSense uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

Reflexivity supports data exports to Excel. AlphaSense has more limited export options.

Both AlphaSense and Reflexivity include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Reflexivity offers portfolio tracking features. AlphaSense is more focused on research and analysis.