AmiBroker vs okama comparison

AmiBroker focuses on Data Visualizations, Screeners, and Backtesting while okama specializes in Quant, Data Visualizations, and Portfolio. They overlap in 6 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

okama offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while AmiBroker requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with okama and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

okama is more beginner-friendly with an approachable interface. Both can work for intermediate users.

okama provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. AmiBroker doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose AmiBroker if you need Portfolio-level backtesting with realistic account constraints and position sizing; customizable reports/metrics (equity/drawdown charts, custom backtest procedure)., and Optimization & validation workflows: portfolio-level optimization, walk-forward testing, and Monte Carlo simulation/robustness testing.. Go with okama if Interactive Efficient Frontier (mean–variance) widget for quick visualization., and Compare-assets widget covering returns, drawdowns, CVaR, and correlations. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, Mutual Funds, and Currencies. AmiBroker also includes Futures. okama adds coverage for ETFs, and Commodities.

AmiBroker supports data exports to CSV. okama has more limited export options.

AmiBroker connects with brokers for portfolio syncing. okama requires manual portfolio entry or data import.

AmiBroker is built with active traders in mind, offering features like real-time data and technical analysis. okama is better suited for buy-and-hold investors focused on fundamentals.

AmiBroker includes a stock screener for finding investment ideas. okama focuses on other analytical tools.

okama offers portfolio tracking features. AmiBroker is more focused on research and analysis.