Digrin vs Stockopedia comparison

Digrin focuses on Portfolio, Screeners, and Dividends while Stockopedia specializes in Screeners, Stock Ideas, and Financials. They overlap in 4 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Digrin offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while Stockopedia requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with Digrin and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

Stockopedia has a mobile app so you can check your research on the go. Digrin is web-only, so you'll need a browser to access it from mobile devices.

Choose Digrin if you need Portfolio tracking for dividend investors: portfolio value, annual dividends, Yield on Cost (YoC), XIRR, gain/loss, dividend yield/YoC columns, and transaction history views., and Dividend tools: portfolio dividend calendar (paid, announced, and projected dividends) plus public “Upcoming Ex‑Dividends” lists with dividend yield, years paying, and frequency.. Go with Stockopedia if Equity screener with more than 350 ratios and over 65 prebuilt “GuruScreens.”, and StockRanks™ system rates every stock on Quality, Value, and Momentum, with additional risk ratings and style classifications. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, and ETFs. Stockopedia adds coverage for Closed-End Funds.

Both platforms let you export data to spreadsheets (CSV). This is useful for custom analysis or record-keeping.

Digrin connects with brokers for portfolio syncing. Stockopedia requires manual portfolio entry or data import.

Both Digrin and Stockopedia include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Both platforms include portfolio tracking, so you can monitor your holdings, performance, and allocation in one place.