VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ BEST INVESTING TOOLS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Sunday, January 4, 2026

Tool Comparison

Nasdaq.com vs Stockopedia comparison

Compare pricing, supported platforms, categories, and standout capabilities to decide which tool fits your workflow.

Nasdaq.com logo

Nasdaq.com

nasdaq.com

PricingFree, Subscription
PlatformsWeb, Mobile
Hands-on review
Stockopedia logo

Stockopedia

stockopedia.com

PricingSubscription
PlatformsWeb, Mobile
Editor's pickHands-on review

Comparison highlights

  • Tool score: the chart below shows community vote sentiment over the last 8 weeks. Use it as a signal, not a verdict.
  • Overlap: both cover Screeners, Portfolio, and Watchlist and 6 other categories.
  • Coverage tilt: Nasdaq.com has 9 categories you won't get in Stockopedia; Stockopedia has 8 unique categories.
  • Pricing: Nasdaq.com is Free, Subscription; Stockopedia is Subscription.

Category leaders

  • Screeners: not enough category votes yet to call a leader.
  • Portfolio: not enough category votes yet to call a leader.
  • Watchlist: not enough category votes yet to call a leader.
  • News: not enough category votes yet to call a leader.
  • Data Visualizations: Stockopedia is tagged for this workflow; Nasdaq.com has no category votes yet.

Vote sentiment comparison

Cumulative positive vote share. Loading fresh totals...

Nasdaq.comStockopedia

Side-by-side metrics

AttributeNasdaq.comStockopedia
Asset types

Supported asset classes and universes

Stocks, ETFs, Mutual Funds, Options, Cryptos, Currencies

Stocks, ETFs, Closed-End Funds

Experience levels

Who each product is built for

Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced

Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced

Platforms

Where you can access the product

Web, Mobile

Web, Mobile

Pricing

High-level pricing models

Free, Subscription

Subscription

Tested

Verified by hands-on testing inside Find My Moat

Yes

Yes

Editor pick

Featured inside curated shortlists

Standard listing

Highlighted

Coverage overlap

Nasdaq.com strengths

Categories covered by Nasdaq.com but not Stockopedia.

Stockopedia strengths

Categories covered by Stockopedia but not Nasdaq.com.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which workflows do Nasdaq.com and Stockopedia both support?

Both platforms cover Screeners, Portfolio, Watchlist, News, Calendar, Financials, Analyst Forecasts, Analyst Price Targets, and Analyst Recommendations workflows, so you can research those use cases in either tool before digging into the feature differences below.

Which tool offers a free plan?

Nasdaq.com offers a free entry point, while Stockopedia requires a paid subscription. Review the pricing table to see how the paid tiers compare.

How can you access Nasdaq.com and Stockopedia?

Both Nasdaq.com and Stockopedia support web and mobile access, making it easy to keep tabs on research away from the desk.

What unique strengths set the two platforms apart?

Nasdaq.com differentiates itself with Real-time U.S. quotes with continuously updating bid/ask via Nasdaq Basic, with data credited to Nasdaq Data Link., Built-in screeners for stocks, ETFs, and mutual funds with filterable metrics., and Options chains enhanced with Greeks such as Delta, Gamma, and Vega., whereas Stockopedia stands out for Equity screener with more than 350 ratios and over 65 prebuilt “GuruScreens.”, StockRanks™ system rates every stock on Quality, Value, and Momentum, with additional risk ratings and style classifications., and Portfolios (“Folios”) track performance with time-weighted returns and integrate company announcements and reporting calendars..

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.