Stockopedia vs Zacks (Zacks.com) comparison

Stockopedia focuses on Screeners, Stock Ideas, and Financials while Zacks (Zacks.com) specializes in Screeners, ETF Screeners, and Watchlist. They overlap in 9 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Zacks (Zacks.com) offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while Stockopedia requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with Zacks (Zacks.com) and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

Choose Stockopedia if you need Equity screener with more than 350 ratios and over 65 prebuilt “GuruScreens.”, and StockRanks™ system rates every stock on Quality, Value, and Momentum, with additional risk ratings and style classifications.. Go with Zacks (Zacks.com) if Zacks Rank system (#1–#5) and Zacks Industry Rank shown on company pages., and Style Scores across Value, Growth, and Momentum factors. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, and ETFs. Stockopedia also includes Closed-End Funds. Zacks (Zacks.com) adds coverage for Mutual Funds.

Zacks (Zacks.com) offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. Stockopedia uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

Stockopedia supports data exports to CSV, and Excel. Zacks (Zacks.com) has more limited export options.

Both Stockopedia and Zacks (Zacks.com) include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Both platforms include portfolio tracking, so you can monitor your holdings, performance, and allocation in one place.