★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

Checking

Kongsberg Gruppen ASA

KOG · Euronext Oslo Bors

Market cap (USD)$27.3B
SectorIndustrials
IndustryAerospace & Defense
CountryNO
Data as of
Moat score
81/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Kongsberg Gruppen ASA is now a more focused Norwegian defence and technology group after Kongsberg Maritime was demerged and listed separately on April 23, 2026. The continuing company is managed through Defence Systems, Missiles & Aerostructures, and Discovery, with Kongsberg Digital inside Other. Moats are strongest in allied government procurement relationships, qualification/design-in cycles, missile and air-defence backlog, and specialised subsea-to-space know-how. Q1 2026 backlog reached NOK 152 billion, with later June orders adding missile and NASAMS demand. The main risks are execution capacity, export controls, political procurement cycles, and valuation sensitivity after rapid defence-led growth.

Primary segment

Defence Systems

Market structure

Oligopoly

Market share

80% (reported)

HHI:

Coverage

4 segments · 7 tags

Updated 2026-07-01

Segments

Defence Systems

Air defence, counter-UAS, remote weapon stations, naval combat systems and command-and-control systems

Revenue

44.8%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

80% (reported)

Peers

RTXLMTNOCGD+3

Missiles & Aerostructures

Naval Strike Missile, Joint Strike Missile, missile systems, space systems and F-35 aerostructures/MRO

Revenue

29.9%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

RTXLMTNOCBA+3

Discovery

Ocean-space and defence technology: subsea sensors, hydroacoustics, positioning, uncrewed platforms, small satellites and space services

Revenue

23%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

TDYLHXHEXA-B.STTRMB+1

Kongsberg Digital and other activities

Industrial software for digital twins, energy simulation, well operations and asset-performance workflows

Revenue

2.3%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

SIE.DESCHN.PADSY.PAPTC+1

Moat Claims

Defence Systems

Air defence, counter-UAS, remote weapon stations, naval combat systems and command-and-control systems

Revenue share is Q1 2026 division revenue of MNOK 4,138 divided by KONGSBERG APM revenue of MNOK 9,234. Operating-profit share is normalised against the three disclosed division EBIT figures before unallocated/other losses.

Oligopoly

Government Contracting Relationships

Legal

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Defence Systems is embedded in allied procurement channels for air defence, counter-drone and weapon-station systems.

Government Contracting Relationships moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Procurement cycles and defence budgets shift with politics
  • Export licences or localisation requirements restrict delivery
  • Prime contractors bundle alternative systems

Leading indicators

  • New allied customer awards
  • Book-to-bill and backlog growth in Defence Systems
  • Export approval cadence and delivery milestones

Counterarguments

  • Governments can re-tender or favor domestic suppliers
  • Large US and European primes have broader portfolios and political reach

Long Term Contracts

Demand

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 5 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

A large multi-year order backlog supports capacity utilisation and revenue visibility.

Long Term Contracts moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Backlog conversion delays or customer-driven schedule changes
  • Cost inflation on long-duration fixed-price programs
  • Supply chain constraints for critical electronics and effectors

Leading indicators

  • Backlog coverage by delivery year
  • Program milestone execution
  • Gross/EBIT margin stability on large programs

Counterarguments

  • Backlog is concentrated and lumpy by program
  • Visibility does not eliminate execution risk

Design In Qualification

Demand

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Weapon stations, naval combat systems and air-defence architectures require integration, testing and customer acceptance.

Design In Qualification moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Interoperability standards lower switching barriers
  • Alternative systems qualify on the same platforms

Leading indicators

  • New platform/program integrations
  • Qualification and certification milestones

Counterarguments

  • Qualified status can be lost if cost, schedule or performance slips
  • Prime contractors can pressure subsystem margins

Missiles & Aerostructures

Naval Strike Missile, Joint Strike Missile, missile systems, space systems and F-35 aerostructures/MRO

Revenue share is Q1 2026 division revenue of MNOK 2,759 divided by KONGSBERG APM revenue of MNOK 9,234. Operating-profit share is normalised against the three disclosed division EBIT figures before unallocated/other losses.

Oligopoly

Design In Qualification

Demand

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

JSM/NSM adoption requires platform integration, export approval and customer testing; F-35-related work has long qualification cycles.

Design In Qualification moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Alternative weapons qualify on the same aircraft
  • Export controls or partner politics delay adoption
  • Platform OEM changes integration priorities

Leading indicators

  • New JSM/NSM customer nations
  • Platform integration milestones
  • Repeat orders from existing missile customers

Counterarguments

  • Missile procurement remains competitive and politically sensitive
  • Large missile houses have broader portfolios and production scale

Long Term Contracts

Demand

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 5 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

A large missile/aerospace backlog gives multi-year visibility and supports capacity investment.

Long Term Contracts moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Backlog execution stretches suppliers and labor capacity
  • Customer delivery schedules shift
  • Cost escalation erodes fixed-contract margins

Leading indicators

  • Backlog delivery-year mix
  • Missile production throughput
  • Supplier on-time delivery and quality

Counterarguments

  • Backlog is not a moat if production cannot scale profitably
  • Large orders can pressure working capital and supplier capacity

Capex Knowhow Scale

Supply

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Missile production requires engineering know-how, specialised facilities and supplier scaling.

Capex Knowhow Scale moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Capacity additions overshoot demand
  • Production learning-curve issues hurt cost and delivery
  • Specialised inputs become constrained

Leading indicators

  • Capex and new facility commissioning
  • Missile unit production growth
  • Program margin and warranty trends

Counterarguments

  • Rivals are also expanding missile capacity
  • Scale advantages may be shared with government-funded capacity

Discovery

Ocean-space and defence technology: subsea sensors, hydroacoustics, positioning, uncrewed platforms, small satellites and space services

Revenue share is Q1 2026 division revenue of MNOK 2,125 divided by KONGSBERG APM revenue of MNOK 9,234. Operating-profit share is normalised against the three disclosed division EBIT figures before unallocated/other losses.

Competitive

Capex Knowhow Scale

Supply

Strength

Strength 3 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 3 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Specialised sensing, autonomy, hydroacoustics and space payloads require deep engineering know-how.

Capex Knowhow Scale moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Rapid technology change and new entrants in sensors/autonomy
  • Defense export control constraints on high-end tech
  • Commercial ocean markets weaken while defence demand rises

Leading indicators

  • R&D intensity and new product cadence
  • Order intake growth in uncrewed/sensing product lines
  • Space and defence mix within Discovery

Counterarguments

  • Ocean-tech markets are fragmented with strong niche competitors

Design In Qualification

Demand

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

High share of customised deliveries implies qualification and integration work that makes supplier switching harder.

Design In Qualification moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Commoditisation of certain sensor components
  • Customers standardise on open architectures to reduce lock-in

Leading indicators

  • Share of revenue recognised over time (custom projects)
  • Gross margin stability across project mix

Counterarguments

  • Customers may prefer best-of-breed components and mix vendors

Kongsberg Digital and other activities

Industrial software for digital twins, energy simulation, well operations and asset-performance workflows

Kongsberg Digital is not a separate reportable segment and is reported within Other with Kongsberg IT, property and corporate functions. Revenue share is the Q1 2026 APM revenue residual after the three disclosed divisions, so it is an upper-bound proxy rather than pure Digital revenue.

Competitive

Data Workflow Lockin

Demand

Strength

Strength 3 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 3 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Workflow automation and integrating multi-source industrial data increases switching costs once embedded in operations.

Data Workflow Lockin moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Competition from large industrial suites and hyperscalers
  • Open data standards reduce platform switching costs

Leading indicators

  • Net retention / renewal rates if disclosed
  • Growth in connected assets and contracted customers

Counterarguments

  • Industrial software markets are crowded; switching can be funded if ROI is clear

Ecosystem Complements

Network

Strength

Strength 3 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 3 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

Customer-specific industrial data models and capitalized development can complement software workflows, though this remains a small non-reportable unit.

Ecosystem Complements moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Capitalized software does not translate into commercial adoption
  • Services-heavy deployments reduce product defensibility

Leading indicators

  • ARR/renewals if disclosed
  • KogniTwin deployment count
  • Digital operating losses or capitalized development balance

Counterarguments

  • Digital remains small and below reportable-segment size
  • Large software vendors can bundle competing digital-twin tools

Evidence

other

C-UAS contract with Poland

Q1 2026 order intake was driven by a NOK 16 billion counter-UAS award to Poland.

news

US Foreign Military Sales programme

NASAMS export via Raytheon and the US FMS channel supports government contracting relationship depth.

other

order backlog, which now amounts to MNOK 80,030

Division backlog in Q1 2026 gives multi-year visibility; 48% was scheduled for 2028 or later.

other

remote weapon stations for the CAVS 6x6 programme

Vehicle-program integration supports design-in and qualification switching costs.

news

modularity and open architecture

NASAMS architecture supports lifecycle adaptation after customer selection.

Showing 5 of 18 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Procurement cycles and defence budgets shift with politics
  • Export licences or localisation requirements restrict delivery
  • Prime contractors bundle alternative systems
  • Backlog conversion delays or customer-driven schedule changes
  • Cost inflation on long-duration fixed-price programs
  • Supply chain constraints for critical electronics and effectors

Leading indicators

  • New allied customer awards
  • Book-to-bill and backlog growth in Defence Systems
  • Export approval cadence and delivery milestones
  • Backlog coverage by delivery year
  • Program milestone execution
  • Gross/EBIT margin stability on large programs

Keep the research going

Created 2025-12-28
Updated 2026-07-01

More Rankings & Systems

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.