DeepVest vs Reflexivity comparison

DeepVest focuses on Wealth Management, AI, and AI Chat while Reflexivity specializes in Screeners, Quant, and Performance Attribution. They overlap in 8 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

DeepVest offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while Reflexivity requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with DeepVest and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

Reflexivity provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. DeepVest doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose DeepVest if you need Conversational “investment intelligence” interface: ask investment questions and generate research/portfolio strategy via natural language (incl. model portfolios, optimizations, screening, technical/fundamental/macro analysis)., and Backtesting tooling: marketed as “instant backtesting”/strategy backtesting available in-product (Free includes strategy backtesting).. Go with Reflexivity if Institutional-grade AI research environment with verified data from S&P Global, Refinitiv Datastream, Nasdaq, and Cboe-all included without the need for separate data contracts., and Deep Research agent that can write and execute Python, run backtests, generate Excel models, export code and data, and produce publication-ready reports. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, ETFs, Bonds, and Currencies. DeepVest also includes Options, Mutual Funds, and Cryptos. Reflexivity adds coverage for Commodities.

Yes, both platforms provide real-time market data. This makes either suitable for active trading strategies where timing matters.

Reflexivity supports data exports to Excel. DeepVest has more limited export options.

Both DeepVest and Reflexivity include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Both platforms include portfolio tracking, so you can monitor your holdings, performance, and allocation in one place.