Fey vs Stockopedia comparison

Fey focuses on Screeners, Portfolio, and Watchlist while Stockopedia specializes in Screeners, Stock Ideas, and Financials. They overlap in 8 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Fey offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while Stockopedia requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with Fey and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

Stockopedia has a mobile app so you can check your research on the go. Fey is web-only, so you'll need a browser to access it from mobile devices.

Choose Fey if you need Finder (NLQ): type ideas like “undervalued tech with insider buying” or “Nancy Pelosi portfolio”; Fey turns this into an editable screen in ~2s (“Like ChatGPT meets Bloomberg”)., and Earnings ‘at the speed of now’: instant press releases with **AI‑generated summaries** (~0.8s), live calls in‑app, transcripts and transcript summaries.. Go with Stockopedia if Equity screener with more than 350 ratios and over 65 prebuilt “GuruScreens.”, and StockRanks™ system rates every stock on Quality, Value, and Momentum, with additional risk ratings and style classifications. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, and ETFs. Stockopedia adds coverage for Closed-End Funds.

Fey offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. Stockopedia uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

Both platforms let you export data to spreadsheets (Excel). This is useful for custom analysis or record-keeping.

Fey connects with brokers for portfolio syncing. Stockopedia requires manual portfolio entry or data import.

Both Fey and Stockopedia include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Both platforms include portfolio tracking, so you can monitor your holdings, performance, and allocation in one place.