Fiscal.ai vs Intrinio comparison

Both platforms cover ETF Holdings, Financials, Dividends, Institutional Data, Analyst Forecasts, Analyst Recommendations, Analyst Price Targets, News, Splits, and Data APIs workflows, so you can research those use cases in either tool before digging into the feature differences below.

Fiscal.ai offers a free entry point, while Intrinio requires a paid subscription. Review the pricing table to see how the paid tiers compare.

Both Fiscal.ai and Intrinio prioritize web or desktop access. Investors wanting a mobile-first workflow may need to rely on responsive web views.

Fiscal.ai differentiates itself with Modern web-based research terminal with dashboards, customizable watchlists, portfolio stats, and fundamental charting for 100,000+ global stocks, ETFs, and funds., Deep fundamental coverage: 10–20+ years of annual and 6–40+ quarters of quarterly financials by plan, with ratios, common-size statements, and adjusted metrics., and Rich segment & KPI database across ~2,300 large-cap names, including company-specific business KPIs that are hard to aggregate manually., whereas Intrinio stands out for REST API with JSON output and WebSocket streaming for real-time market data., SDKs available for Python and R, with detailed documentation and examples., and US fundamentals: standardized and as-reported data back to 2006, sourced from SEC filings, updated in real time as filings arrive..