Tool Comparison
Fiscal.ai vs okama
- Paid from
- $39/mo
- Free plan
- Yes
- Platforms
- Web, API
Best if
- Delayed quotes won't cut it; you need real-time data
- You want stock ideas, screeners, and stock comparison.
- You're a long-term investor who cares more about fundamentals than headlines
- Paid from
- —
- Free plan
- Yes
- Platforms
- Web, API
Best if
- You want quant, correlation, and backtesting.
Pick Fiscal.ai if
Fiscal.ai
Free • From $39/mo · Web · API
- Delayed quotes won't cut it; you need real-time data
- You want stock ideas, screeners, and stock comparison.
- You're a long-term investor who cares more about fundamentals than headlines
Pick okama if
okama
Free · Web · API
- You want quant, correlation, and backtesting.
Skip both if: Neither one clicks with how you research; there are strong third options.
See alternativesOther tools you might like
Outbound links may include affiliate or sponsor codes.
Not set on either one? See the top 50 tools, ranked by user votes, or the deals page for big discounts on popular tools.
Our take
The bottom line
Fiscal.ai and okama cover a lot of the same ground (4 shared categories, including data visualizations, portfolio, and ETF analysis), so for the basics you won't go far wrong with either. Fiscal.ai simply does more: 29 categories to okama's 10, including stock ideas, screeners, and stock comparison. okama counters by being completely free.
What readers say
Fiscal.ai
No votes yet. Cast the first one.
okama
No votes yet. Cast the first one.
Key differences at a glance
- Real-time data
- Fiscal.ai
- Free trial
- Fiscal.ai14 days
- Broader coverage
- Fiscal.ai29 vs 10 categories
- Free plan
- Both
What Fiscal.ai does best
- Research coverage for global stocks, ETFs, mutual funds, and funds through dashboards, watchlists, portfolio views, visualizations, fundamentals, estimates, transcripts, filings, news, and event data.
- Use AI Copilot, summaries, and generated reports for earnings, filings, peer comparisons, financial analysis, and company research.
- Analysis of fundamentals, ratios, standardized financials, as-reported data, adjusted metrics, segment data, KPIs, analyst estimates, revisions, ratings, and price targets.
- Run 24 documented Fiscal Skills in MCP clients for financial models, company snapshots, screens, valuation, ownership, fund letters, filings, credit, quality scores, and earnings analysis.
- Trace research back to source filings, transcripts, slides, company news, investor-relations material, and source-to-filing images or PDFs where supported.
What okama does best
- Web widgets for efficient frontier visualization, asset comparison, and adjusted monthly portfolio risk/return analysis.
- Python tools for constrained mean-variance optimization, multi-period efficient frontiers, rebalancing constraints, and portfolio simulations.
- Risk analysis with VaR, CVaR, semideviation, drawdowns, volatility, correlations, and related statistics.
- Monte Carlo simulations and wealth-index forecasts with percentile bands.
- Contribution and withdrawal modeling for portfolio paths and retirement scenarios.
Side by side
Pricing comparison
See for yourself
Side by side
Price, platforms, data, and market coverage.ShowHide
Side by side
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pricing & plans | ||
Starting price | Free • From $39/mo | Free |
Free tier | Yes | Yes |
Free trial | 14 days | — |
Plan limits | 37 limits: Terminal - Free: financials history (annual): 10, Terminal - Free: financials history (quarterly): 6 +35 more | — |
| Platforms & access | ||
Web app | Yes | Yes |
Mobile app | No | No |
API access | Yes | Yes |
Broker sync | No | No |
Integrations | MCP, Claude Connector +7 more | — |
| Audience & fit | ||
Experience level | Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced | Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced |
Best for | Retail Traders, Pro Retail +11 more | — |
Categories covered | 29 | 10 |
Regions | North America, Europe, APAC, LatAm, Middle East, Africa | North America, Europe, APAC, Middle East |
| Data & capabilities | ||
Data quality | 3 signals: Latency: Real-time, 15-min Delayed, and End of Day, Granularity: Tick and EOD +1 more | 3 signals: Latency: End of Day, Granularity: EOD +1 more |
Data partners | 5 partners: Fiscal.ai Data Feed, S&P Global Market Intelligence +3 more | — |
Capabilities | 4 signals: Custom formulas, Universe builder +2 more | 4 signals: VaR/ES, Monte Carlo +2 more |
Security | SOC2 and Status page | — |
| Try it | Visit Fiscal.ai | Visit okama |
Standout features
The best features of Fiscal.ai and okama.ShowHide
Standout features
What Fiscal.ai does best
- Research coverage for global stocks, ETFs, mutual funds, and funds through dashboards, watchlists, portfolio views, visualizations, fundamentals, estimates, transcripts, filings, news, and event data.
- Use AI Copilot, summaries, and generated reports for earnings, filings, peer comparisons, financial analysis, and company research.
- Analysis of fundamentals, ratios, standardized financials, as-reported data, adjusted metrics, segment data, KPIs, analyst estimates, revisions, ratings, and price targets.
- Run 24 documented Fiscal Skills in MCP clients for financial models, company snapshots, screens, valuation, ownership, fund letters, filings, credit, quality scores, and earnings analysis.
- Trace research back to source filings, transcripts, slides, company news, investor-relations material, and source-to-filing images or PDFs where supported.
What okama does best
- Web widgets for efficient frontier visualization, asset comparison, and adjusted monthly portfolio risk/return analysis.
- Python tools for constrained mean-variance optimization, multi-period efficient frontiers, rebalancing constraints, and portfolio simulations.
- Risk analysis with VaR, CVaR, semideviation, drawdowns, volatility, correlations, and related statistics.
- Monte Carlo simulations and wealth-index forecasts with percentile bands.
- Contribution and withdrawal modeling for portfolio paths and retirement scenarios.
All details
Every attribute we track for Fiscal.ai and okama.ShowHide
All details
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Coverage & fit | ||
Asset types | StocksETFsMutual FundsFunds | StocksETFsCommoditiesCurrenciesMutual Funds |
Experience | BeginnerIntermediateAdvanced | BeginnerIntermediateAdvanced |
Target audience | Retail TradersPro RetailInstitutional InvestorsAnalystsQuants/DevelopersLong-term InvestorsValue InvestorsGrowth Investors+5 more | Not specified |
Regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLatAmMiddle EastAfrica | North AmericaEuropeAPACMiddle East |
Coverage details | Identifiers: Ticker, CUSIP, ISIN, and FIGI | Identifiers: Ticker |
| Data | ||
Data freshness | Real-time15-min DelayedEnd of Day | End of Day |
Data granularity | TickEOD | EOD |
Data partners | Fiscal.ai Data FeedS&P Global Market IntelligenceMorningstarYChartsPerplexity | Not specified |
| Access & integrations | ||
API protocols | REST | REST |
API auth & delivery | Auth: APIKeyWebhooks50 req/minDocs | Auth: NoneSDKs: Python |
Import methods | Manual | Not specified |
Integrations | MCPClaude ConnectorChatGPTCodex CLICursorVS Code CopilotGemini CLIPerplexity+1 more | Not specified |
Export formats | CSVImagePDF | Not specified |
| Plans & trust | ||
Security & compliance | SOC2Status page | Not specified |
Capability signals | Custom formulasUniverse builderCitation pinningAI summaries: Filings, Transcripts, and News | VaR/ESMonte CarloRebalancingCorrelation |
Vendor & support | Stratosphere Technology Inc.Country: CanadaFounded 2021Support: Email | MBK Development LLCSupport: Forum |
Curation ratings | Methodology 5/5Reliability 4/5UX 5/5 | Methodology 4/5Reliability 4/5UX 3/5 |
Green tags are exclusive to that tool in this comparison.
Pricing
Plans, billing, free trials, and monthly prices.ShowHide
Pricing
| Tier | ||
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Free“Terminal - Free”financials history (annual): 10 · financials history (quarterly): 6 · +8 more | Free |
| Entry paid plan | $39/mo“Terminal - Pro (Monthly)”financials history (annual): 15 · financials history (quarterly): 20 · +10 more | — |
| Top plan | $199/mo“Terminal - Enterprise (Monthly)”financials history (annual): 20+ · financials history (quarterly): 40+ · +10 more | — |
| Custom / enterprise | Contact sales“API - Paid” | — |
| Free trial | 14 days | — |
Alternatives
Free alternatives
Questions we keep getting
What's the difference between Fiscal.ai and okama?
Fiscal.ai leans toward stock ideas, screeners, and stock comparison, while okama puts more weight on quant, data visualizations, and portfolio. They overlap in 4 categories, so for most people it comes down to workflow preference and price.
How much do Fiscal.ai and okama cost?
Good news: both Fiscal.ai and okama have free plans, so you can run them side by side and only pay if you hit a wall.
Do Fiscal.ai and okama have APIs?
Yes, both offer API access, so developers and quants can pull data programmatically or wire up their own integrations.
Should I choose Fiscal.ai or okama?
It depends on what you're after. Pick Fiscal.ai if stock ideas and screeners matter to you; go with okama if you'd rather have quant and correlation. And if you only need the basics both share, let price decide.
What asset classes do Fiscal.ai and okama cover?
Both cover stocks, ETFs, and mutual funds. Fiscal.ai also handles funds. okama adds commodities and currencies on top.
Does Fiscal.ai or okama have real-time data?
Fiscal.ai offers real-time data, which matters if you trade actively. okama runs on delayed or end-of-day data, which is perfectly fine for longer-term investors who don't live and die by the tick.
Can I export data from Fiscal.ai and okama?
Fiscal.ai exports to CSV. okama is stingier about getting data out.
Which has a better stock screener: Fiscal.ai or okama?
Fiscal.ai has a stock screener for surfacing ideas; okama doesn't, and focuses its energy elsewhere.
Can I track my portfolio with Fiscal.ai or okama?
Yes, both do portfolio tracking: holdings, performance, and allocation in one place.
Keep researching
More comparisons to check
Other tools you might like
Keep Exploring
Feedback
Spot stale pricing, missing features, or a comparison that feels off? Send feedback on the verdict, table, alternatives, or recommendation.
Curation & Accuracy
This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).
Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.