Fiscal.ai vs okama comparison

Both platforms cover Data Visualizations, Portfolio, ETF Performance, and Data APIs workflows, so you can research those use cases in either tool before digging into the feature differences below.

Both Fiscal.ai and okama keep freemium access with optional paid upgrades, so you can trial each platform before committing.

Both Fiscal.ai and okama prioritize web or desktop access. Investors wanting a mobile-first workflow may need to rely on responsive web views.

Fiscal.ai differentiates itself with Modern web-based research terminal with dashboards, customizable watchlists, portfolio stats, and fundamental charting for 100,000+ global stocks, ETFs, and funds., Deep fundamental coverage: 10–20+ years of annual and 6–40+ quarters of quarterly financials by plan, with ratios, common-size statements, and adjusted metrics., and Rich segment & KPI database across ~2,300 large-cap names, including company-specific business KPIs that are hard to aggregate manually., whereas okama stands out for Interactive Efficient Frontier (mean–variance) widget for quick visualization., Compare-assets widget covering returns, drawdowns, CVaR, and correlations., and Portfolio widget built on adjusted monthly data for risk/return analysis..