InsideArbitrage vs Stockopedia comparison

InsideArbitrage focuses on News, Alerts, and Calendar while Stockopedia specializes in Screeners, Stock Ideas, and Financials. They overlap in 9 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

InsideArbitrage offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while Stockopedia requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with InsideArbitrage and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

Stockopedia has a mobile app so you can check your research on the go. InsideArbitrage is web-only, so you'll need a browser to access it from mobile devices.

Choose InsideArbitrage if you need Merger Arbitrage Tool with announced‑deal lists, spread tracking, calendars and deal updates; ‘Deals in the Works’ and deal post‑mortems., and Insider data hub with ‘Insider Weekends’, cluster buys, buys near highs, flip‑floppers, top‑performing insiders and sector heat‑map.. Go with Stockopedia if Equity screener with more than 350 ratios and over 65 prebuilt “GuruScreens.”, and StockRanks™ system rates every stock on Quality, Value, and Momentum, with additional risk ratings and style classifications. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, and ETFs. Stockopedia adds coverage for Closed-End Funds.

InsideArbitrage offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. Stockopedia uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

Stockopedia supports data exports to CSV, and Excel. InsideArbitrage has more limited export options.

Both InsideArbitrage and Stockopedia include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Both platforms include portfolio tracking, so you can monitor your holdings, performance, and allocation in one place.