Stock Rover vs Testfol.io comparison

Both platforms cover Correlation workflows, so you can research those use cases in either tool before digging into the feature differences below.

Both Stock Rover and Testfol.io keep freemium access with optional paid upgrades, so you can trial each platform before committing.

Stock Rover ships a dedicated mobile experience, while Testfol.io focuses on web or desktop access.

Stock Rover differentiates itself with Spreadsheet‑style Table lets you compare stocks, ETFs and mutual funds side‑by‑side with customizable views and an Insight Panel showing detailed fundamentals, analyst ratings, news and earnings transcripts., Powerful stock and ETF screener supports hundreds of metrics, ranked screening and equation‑based filters, with more metrics and history unlocked at higher tiers (up to 700+ metrics in Premium Plus)., and Portfolio Management covers brokerage integration, portfolio analytics, automatic performance emails, dividend income projections, Monte Carlo simulations, correlation analysis, trade planning and rebalancing tools., whereas Testfol.io stands out for Portfolio Backtester for constructing multi-asset portfolios (tickers like ETFs, mutual funds, and stocks) with cashflow legs and rebalancing controls (incl. rebalance bands)., Backtest results include performance & risk statistics such as cumulative return, CAGR, MWRR, max drawdown, volatility, Sharpe/Sortino, beta, etc., and Asset Analyzer for historical performance analysis and correlations; correlations are calculated using daily returns..