Stock Rover vs Stockopedia comparison

Both platforms cover Screeners, Data Visualizations, Portfolio, Watchlist, News, Alerts, Calendar, Financials, Scores, Analyst Recommendations, Analyst Price Targets, and Education workflows, so you can research those use cases in either tool before digging into the feature differences below.

Stock Rover offers a free entry point, while Stockopedia requires a paid subscription. Review the pricing table to see how the paid tiers compare.

Both Stock Rover and Stockopedia support web and mobile access, making it easy to keep tabs on research away from the desk.

Stock Rover differentiates itself with Spreadsheet‑style Table lets you compare stocks, ETFs and mutual funds side‑by‑side with customizable views and an Insight Panel showing detailed fundamentals, analyst ratings, news and earnings transcripts., Powerful stock and ETF screener supports hundreds of metrics, ranked screening and equation‑based filters, with more metrics and history unlocked at higher tiers (up to 700+ metrics in Premium Plus)., and Portfolio Management covers brokerage integration, portfolio analytics, automatic performance emails, dividend income projections, Monte Carlo simulations, correlation analysis, trade planning and rebalancing tools., whereas Stockopedia stands out for Equity screener with more than 350 ratios and over 65 prebuilt “GuruScreens.”, StockRanks™ system rates every stock on Quality, Value, and Momentum, with additional risk ratings and style classifications., and Portfolios (“Folios”) track performance with time-weighted returns and integrate company announcements and reporting calendars..