Stockopedia vs TipRanks comparison

Stockopedia focuses on Screeners, Stock Ideas, and Financials while TipRanks specializes in Stock Ideas, Top Analysts, and Screeners. They overlap in 12 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

TipRanks offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while Stockopedia requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with TipRanks and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

TipRanks provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. Stockopedia doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose Stockopedia if you need Equity screener with more than 350 ratios and over 65 prebuilt “GuruScreens.”, and StockRanks™ system rates every stock on Quality, Value, and Momentum, with additional risk ratings and style classifications.. Go with TipRanks if Tracks and measures performance of financial experts (analysts, bloggers, hedge funds, and corporate insiders) to help investors evaluate who to trust., and Smart Score: proprietary quantitative stock score (1–10) based on 8 factors (analyst ratings, insider transactions, blogger opinions, individual investor sentiment, hedge fund activity, news sentiment, technicals, fundamentals). better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, and ETFs. Stockopedia also includes Closed-End Funds. TipRanks adds coverage for Options, Cryptos, Commodities, and Currencies.

Stockopedia supports data exports to CSV, and Excel. TipRanks has more limited export options.

Both Stockopedia and TipRanks include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Both platforms include portfolio tracking, so you can monitor your holdings, performance, and allocation in one place.