Bank of Japan (BOJ) vs Fiscal.ai comparison

Both platforms cover Calendar, Alerts, and Data Visualizations workflows, so you can research those use cases in either tool before digging into the feature differences below.

Both Bank of Japan (BOJ) and Fiscal.ai keep freemium access with optional paid upgrades, so you can trial each platform before committing.

Both Bank of Japan (BOJ) and Fiscal.ai prioritize web or desktop access. Investors wanting a mobile-first workflow may need to rely on responsive web views.

Bank of Japan (BOJ) differentiates itself with Home page “What’s New” feed includes an RSS link and publishes downloadable releases (commonly PDF and XLSX)., BOJ Time-Series Data Search enables searching, downloading, and graph drawing for ~200,000 long-term BOJ time-series data items., and Time-Series Data Search supports finding series by statistics category, keyword/name of series, or exact series codes; selection can include up to 250 series; users can save the list of selected series codes., whereas Fiscal.ai stands out for Modern web-based research terminal with dashboards, customizable watchlists, portfolio stats, and fundamental charting for 100,000+ global stocks, ETFs, and funds., Deep fundamental coverage: 10–20+ years of annual and 6–40+ quarters of quarterly financials by plan, with ratios, common-size statements, and adjusted metrics., and Rich segment & KPI database across ~2,300 large-cap names, including company-specific business KPIs that are hard to aggregate manually..