Fiscal.ai vs Glassnode comparison

Fiscal.ai focuses on Stock Ideas, Screeners, and Stock Comparison while Glassnode specializes in On-chain Analytics, DEX / DeFi, and Crypto Derivatives. They overlap in 3 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both Fiscal.ai and Glassnode offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

Yes, both platforms offer API access for developers and quants who want to build custom integrations or automate their workflows.

Choose Fiscal.ai if you need Modern web-based research terminal with dashboards, customizable watchlists, portfolio views, and visualizations across global stocks, ETFs, mutual funds, and funds., and Deep fundamentals and segment/KPI coverage, including proprietary KPI feeds for ~2,250+ companies and history depth that scales with plan tier.. Go with Glassnode if Glassnode Studio: web analytics platform with a metrics library, curated dashboards, and a charting/workbench tool to visualize data and test hypotheses., and Plan-gated metric tiers + resolution: Standard (Free) includes Basic (T1) at 24h resolution; Advanced adds Essential (T2) + up to 1h resolution; Professional includes all tiers (T1–T3) + up to 10-minute resolution (where available). better fits how you invest.

Both cover ETFs. Fiscal.ai also includes Stocks, Mutual Funds, and Funds. Glassnode adds coverage for Cryptos, Futures, and Options.

Yes, both platforms provide real-time market data. This makes either suitable for active trading strategies where timing matters.

Both platforms let you export data to spreadsheets (CSV). This is useful for custom analysis or record-keeping.

Fiscal.ai includes a stock screener for finding investment ideas. Glassnode focuses on other analytical tools.

Fiscal.ai offers portfolio tracking features. Glassnode is more focused on research and analysis.