Fiscal.ai vs Nasdaq.com comparison

Fiscal.ai focuses on Stock Ideas, Screeners, and Stock Comparison while Nasdaq.com specializes in Screeners, Portfolio, and Watchlist. They overlap in 15 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both Fiscal.ai and Nasdaq.com offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

Nasdaq.com has a mobile app so you can check your research on the go. Fiscal.ai is web-only, so you'll need a browser to access it from mobile devices.

Fiscal.ai provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. Nasdaq.com doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose Fiscal.ai if you need Modern web-based research terminal with dashboards, customizable watchlists, portfolio views, and visualizations across global stocks, ETFs, mutual funds, and funds., and Deep fundamentals and segment/KPI coverage, including proprietary KPI feeds for ~2,250+ companies and history depth that scales with plan tier.. Go with Nasdaq.com if Real-time U.S. quotes with continuously updating bid/ask via Nasdaq Basic, with data credited to Nasdaq Data Link., and Built-in screeners for stocks, ETFs, and mutual funds with filterable metrics. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, ETFs, and Mutual Funds. Fiscal.ai also includes Funds. Nasdaq.com adds coverage for Options, Cryptos, and Currencies.

Yes, both platforms provide real-time market data. This makes either suitable for active trading strategies where timing matters.

Fiscal.ai supports data exports to CSV, Image, and PDF. Nasdaq.com has more limited export options.

Both Fiscal.ai and Nasdaq.com include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Both platforms include portfolio tracking, so you can monitor your holdings, performance, and allocation in one place.