Fiscal.ai vs Stockopedia comparison

Both platforms cover Screeners, Data Visualizations, Portfolio, Watchlist, Financials, Analyst Forecasts, Analyst Recommendations, Analyst Price Targets, News, Alerts, Calendar, Blogs, Newsletters, and Education workflows, so you can research those use cases in either tool before digging into the feature differences below.

Fiscal.ai offers a free entry point, while Stockopedia requires a paid subscription. Review the pricing table to see how the paid tiers compare.

Stockopedia ships a dedicated mobile experience, while Fiscal.ai focuses on web or desktop access.

Fiscal.ai differentiates itself with Modern web-based research terminal with dashboards, customizable watchlists, portfolio stats, and fundamental charting for 100,000+ global stocks, ETFs, and funds., Deep fundamental coverage: 10–20+ years of annual and 6–40+ quarters of quarterly financials by plan, with ratios, common-size statements, and adjusted metrics., and Rich segment & KPI database across ~2,300 large-cap names, including company-specific business KPIs that are hard to aggregate manually., whereas Stockopedia stands out for Equity screener with more than 350 ratios and over 65 prebuilt “GuruScreens.”, StockRanks™ system rates every stock on Quality, Value, and Momentum, with additional risk ratings and style classifications., and Portfolios (“Folios”) track performance with time-weighted returns and integrate company announcements and reporting calendars..