okama vs Reflexivity comparison

okama focuses on Quant, Data Visualizations, and Portfolio while Reflexivity specializes in Screeners, Quant, and Performance Attribution. They overlap in 4 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

okama offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while Reflexivity requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with okama and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

okama is more beginner-friendly with an approachable interface. Both can work for intermediate users.

Yes, both platforms offer API access for developers and quants who want to build custom integrations or automate their workflows.

Choose okama if you need Interactive Efficient Frontier (mean–variance) widget for quick visualization., and Compare-assets widget covering returns, drawdowns, CVaR, and correlations.. Go with Reflexivity if Institutional-grade AI research environment with verified data from S&P Global, Refinitiv Datastream, Nasdaq, and Cboe-all included without the need for separate data contracts., and Deep Research agent that can write and execute Python, run backtests, generate Excel models, export code and data, and produce publication-ready reports. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, ETFs, Commodities, and Currencies. okama also includes Mutual Funds. Reflexivity adds coverage for Bonds.

Reflexivity offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. okama uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

Reflexivity supports data exports to Excel. okama has more limited export options.

Reflexivity includes a stock screener for finding investment ideas. okama focuses on other analytical tools.

Both platforms include portfolio tracking, so you can monitor your holdings, performance, and allocation in one place.