Fiscal.ai vs TradingView comparison

Both platforms cover Screeners, Data Visualizations, Portfolio, Watchlist, ETF Overview, ETF Performance, ETF Fundamentals, Financials, Valuation Models, Dividends, News, Alerts, Calendar, APIs & SDKs, Webhooks, Blogs, and Education workflows, so you can research those use cases in either tool before digging into the feature differences below.

Both Fiscal.ai and TradingView keep freemium access with optional paid upgrades, so you can trial each platform before committing.

TradingView ships a dedicated mobile experience, while Fiscal.ai focuses on web or desktop access.

Fiscal.ai differentiates itself with Modern web-based research terminal with dashboards, customizable watchlists, portfolio stats, and fundamental charting for 100,000+ global stocks, ETFs, and funds., Deep fundamental coverage: 10–20+ years of annual and 6–40+ quarters of quarterly financials by plan, with ratios, common-size statements, and adjusted metrics., and Rich segment & KPI database across ~2,300 large-cap names, including company-specific business KPIs that are hard to aggregate manually., whereas TradingView stands out for Advanced multi‑asset charting with 20+ chart types, minute‑ and second‑level history, 400+ built‑in indicators, 100K+ community indicators, and 110+ smart drawing tools across web, desktop, and mobile., Comprehensive technical toolset including volume profile and footprint, candlestick pattern recognition, auto chart patterns, Seasonals, and intraday charts based on custom spread formulas., and Cloud‑based alerts for prices, indicators, strategies, drawings, and watchlists, with multi‑condition logic, second‑based triggers, and delivery via browser pop‑ups, email, TradingView apps, and webhooks..