Moat ClaimsEach claim combines strength (1–5), durability (fragile / medium / durable), and confidence (1–5). The average across claims sets the segment base.
VOL. XCIV, NO. 247
WIDE MOAT STOCKS & DURABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES
NO ADVICE
Wide Moat Stocks Ranking
Public companies with durable competitive advantages, ranked and organized by moat type.
This list highlights wide moat stocks and companies with durable competitive advantages. We categorize moats into network effects, switching costs, regulated rails, data lock-in, and physical network density. These advantages are often called economic moats in fundamental analysis.
This is not financial advice.
New to economic moats?Explore 46 moat types across 5 domains: supply, demand, network, legal & financial.
Learn more →Ranked Wide Moat Stocks Database
Saved
Showing 1-30 of 390 companies
| VRSN |  | TechnologySoftware - Infrastructure | 100 | $27B | 88.4% | 67.9% | 50% | Monopoly | Legal | Concession License | Strong | |||||
| 2330 |  | TechnologySemiconductors | 100 | $1.9T | 61.9% | 53.3% | 47% | Quasi-Monopoly | Supply | Capex Knowhow Scale | Strong | |||||
| V | | FinancialsFinancial - Credit Services | 99 | $629.2B | 81.3% | 61.1% | 51.7% | Oligopoly | Network | Two Sided Network | Strong | |||||
| NVDA | | TechnologySemiconductors | 98 | $5.2T | 74.2% | 64% | 63% | Quasi-Monopoly | Network | De Facto Standard | Strong | |||||
| VRTX | | HealthcareBiotechnology | 98 | $111.4B | 86.3% | 39% | 35.4% | Quasi-Monopoly | Legal | IP Choke Point | Strong | |||||
| CNR |  | IndustrialsRailroads | 98 | $72.6B | 41.9% | 37.8% | 27.2% | Duopoly | Legal | Permits Rights Of Way | Moderate | |||||
| AUTO |  | Communication ServicesInternet Content & Information | 97 | $4.8B | 75.5% | 62.2% | 47.1% | Quasi-Monopoly | Network | Two Sided Network | Strong | |||||
| 4661 |  | ConsumerLeisure | 95 | $22.6B | 38.7% | 23.9% | 17.3% | Duopoly | Legal | Content Rights Currency | Strong | |||||
| 0388.HK |  | FinancialsFinancial - Data & Stock Exchanges | 94 | $64.9B | 85.1% | 78.6% | 65.4% | Monopoly | Legal | Concession License | Moderate | |||||
| EVO |  | ConsumerGambling, Resorts & Casinos | 93 | $14.7B | 100% | 59.1% | 50.2% | Oligopoly | Supply | Capex Knowhow Scale | Strong | |||||
| ENB | | EnergyOil & Gas Midstream | 93 | $122.7B | 32.6% | 16.5% | 9.7% | Oligopoly | Legal | Permits Rights Of Way | Moderate | |||||
| ICE | | FinancialsFinancial - Data & Stock Exchanges | 91 | $84.4B | 69% | 40.8% | 30% | Oligopoly | Network | Two Sided Network | Strong | |||||
| AAPL | | TechnologyConsumer Electronics | 91 | $4.6T | 47.9% | 32.6% | 27.2% | Oligopoly | Network | Ecosystem Complements | Strong | |||||
| TCL |  | IndustrialsIndustrial - Infrastructure Operations | 91 | $32.3B | 45.6% | 41.9% | 7.1% | Quasi-Monopoly | Legal | Concession License | Moderate | |||||
| REA | | Communication ServicesInternet Content & Information | 91 | $14.1B | 54.2% | 44.2% | 31.6% | Duopoly | Network | Two Sided Network | Strong | |||||
| BR | | IndustrialsInformation Technology Services | 91 | $17B | 31.3% | 17.1% | 15% | Quasi-Monopoly | Legal | Regulated Standards Pipe | Moderate | |||||
| AIR |  | IndustrialsAerospace & Defense | 91 | $159B | 14.7% | 6.7% | 6.9% | Duopoly | Supply | Capex Knowhow Scale | Moderate | |||||
| 6268 | | IndustrialsIndustrial - Machinery | 90 | $4.1B | 31.7% | 7.4% | 5.8% | Quasi-Monopoly | Supply | Learning Curve Yield | Strong | |||||
| META | | Communication ServicesInternet Content & Information | 89 | $1.6T | 81.9% | 41.2% | 32.8% | Oligopoly | Network | Two Sided Network | Moderate | |||||
| RMV | | Real EstateInternet Content & Information | 88 | $4.3B | 99.3% | 66.8% | 50.3% | Quasi-Monopoly | Network | Two Sided Network | Strong | |||||
| GAW | | ConsumerLeisure | 87 | $9B | 71.8% | 41.9% | 31.1% | Oligopoly | Legal | IP Choke Point | Strong | |||||
| MO | | ConsumerTobacco | 87 | $120.6B | 67.8% | 50.7% | 36.9% | Oligopoly | Demand | Brand Trust | Strong | |||||
| AMZN | | ConsumerSpecialty Retail | 87 | $2.9T | 50.6% | 11.5% | 12.2% | Oligopoly | Supply | Capex Knowhow Scale | Moderate | |||||
| GOOGL | | Communication ServicesInternet Content & Information | 86 | $4.7T | 60.4% | 32.7% | 37.9% | Quasi-Monopoly | Network | Data Network Effects | Strong | |||||
| SNPS | | TechnologySoftware - Infrastructure | 86 | $101B | 75.1% | 10.8% | 13.8% | Oligopoly | Demand | Switching Costs General | Moderate | |||||
| WST | | HealthcareMedical - Instruments & Supplies | 86 | $22B | 36.2% | 20.7% | 16.9% | Quasi-Monopoly | Demand | Design In Qualification | Moderate | |||||
| 8035 | | TechnologySemiconductors | 86 | $150.3B | 45.3% | 25.6% | 23.5% | Quasi-Monopoly | Demand | Design In Qualification | Strong | |||||
| FTNT | | TechnologySoftware - Infrastructure | 85 | $94B | 80.7% | 31.1% | 27.5% | Oligopoly | Demand | Suite Bundling | Moderate | |||||
| LYV | | Communication ServicesEntertainment | 84 | $38.9B | 44.7% | 5.5% | 0.3% | Oligopoly | Supply | Physical Network Density | Moderate | |||||
| SHW | | MaterialsChemicals - Specialty | 84 | $76.5B | 49.1% | 16.1% | 10.9% | Quasi-Monopoly | Supply | Distribution Control | Strong |
Page 1 of 13
Wide Moat Atlas
Tracked companies
390
10 sectors represented
Mean moat score
71
63 score 80 or higher
Most common moat
Brand Trust
215 companies tagged
Median gross margin
50.4%
Median across companies with margin data
Keep exploring
Expansion-Stage StocksProven models entering the expansion stage with unit economics that work.
Most Shorted StocksDaily short interest tracker for most shorted stocks and short squeeze stocks.
Low Float StocksDaily low float tracker with float, shares out, and short interest % data.
Investing BooksCurated collection of books on value investing and moat analysis.
Live AnalyticsSee live voting, clicks, and community momentum in the stats hub.
Research ToolsFree tools and resources to help you research stocks and make better decisions.
Moat Score Methodology
How the score works
A structured 0–100 read on durable competitive advantage.
The moat score estimates how durable a company's competitive advantages appear to be. It is built from curated moat claims attached to each business segment — never from price, valuation, or stock performance. Segment scores are weighted by revenue share (or operating profit, when revenue is unavailable) so the biggest segments shape the company-level number the most.
Score Bands
0 – 10080+Elite
Multi-moat dominance with durable pricing power.
70–79High
Strong moat with one or two clear advantages.
60–69Solid
Defensible in places, but not dominant.
< 60Watch
Thin, fragile, or contested moat.
Bands are guides, not grades — two companies in the same band can have very different risk profiles.
What goes into a segment score
Moat DiversityBonus when a segment is defended by multiple distinct moat domains — network effects, switching costs, regulated rails, data lock-in, physical density.
Market StructureMonopolies and quasi-monopolies receive the largest bonus, duopolies and oligopolies a smaller one, fully competitive markets none.
Pricing PowerStrong pricing power adds the most, moderate and weak add less, none adds nothing. Captures whether a business can raise prices without losing volume.
Share & ConcentrationHigher estimated market share and a higher HHI (industry concentration) each contribute a small, capped bonus so they refine rather than dominate.
Segments to Company
A company's score is the weighted average of its segment scores. Weights come from segment revenue share when available, then fall back to operating profit share, and finally to equal weighting if neither is reported. A conglomerate with one strong segment and several weaker ones can still land mid-ranking.
scorecompany = Σ ( scoresegment × weightsegment )
What the score is not
- Not a price target, valuation, or a buy / sell recommendation.
- Does not directly measure management quality, capital allocation, or balance sheet strength.
- A structured opinion on public information — inputs are curated and change as businesses evolve.
Treat the moat score as a starting point for research, not a verdict.
Curation & Accuracy
This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).
Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.